There are many small things I learned through experience, as it moves down the best of a rolling foot hill, or that the outlet holes are not used as thimbles, and among them one of the most important is that when it comes to movies about super-heroes and their third parts, the results are catastrophic. This lesson comes to me now that I just found out that Christopher Nolan is preparing the third part of the new saga of Batman. We all know that I represent orgasm movie The Dark Knigt, with that nihilistic psychopath Joker under the skin of Heath Ledger, a Harvey Dent maimed both physically and mentally to agree on the perfect Two-Face, which appear without a lot of time Because screen printing ten thousand times better than the swill played by Tommy Lee Jones (of which more later). This coupled with an aggressive and epic sound track accompanying a circular argument that since that first image formed by the Batman logo in chaos until the silhouette of the Dark Knight lost to light a highway, make the best film about super heroes I've seen so far to say ... ohh ... sublime.
So the third part of this series is one of the challenges that are dense and turbulent, much more considering the curse of "third parties". Among the large repertoire of disappointment is in the list mentioned three, which dashed to a greater extent than the others, weak illusions that I had to see a decent adaptation. Batman Forever
Both "Batman" and "Batman Returns" both by Tim Burton, had brought back the real Batman, the dark hero of Gotham City, leaving behind the Batman sissy blue mesh the 60, but the scripts for both films were very faithful to the comic we say and the imagination of Burton inserted into the book moved a bit the true essence of hooded. It was more than could be expected, and also the best that had been done in a matter of adjustments so far.
still do not quite understand why, Warner executives decided to remove and replace Burton with Schumacher's stubborn, dial to make a movie more "family" family "?, No no no, it was the beginning of the end. First we took to Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer do not say that did not give the paper, but it belonged Keaton's character Bruce Wayne, he had won. In the end it was the least severe, was decadent destroy the image of Batman, the vigilante was no longer quiet and dark, but a masked Rambo, and not only that. The suit had also changed, now was a kind of armor that marked sexy abs and nipples Guacala! And for more fuck Robin got a story quite grown up and pulled the rebel. Instead of occupying the post of assistant super-hero seemed to her sexual partner. Finally, we have yet to worst. Now come the villains.
What are these two:
That reminds me
No, I would have preferred to see Jim Carrey in Mask 2 than in the role of the Riddler, and does not even mention the Two-Face railed by Tommy Lee Jones. In short, the best thing to do after watching Batman Forever is given in the head with an anvil in the hope to forget. And from there go straight to see "Batman Begins."
X-Men: The Last Stand
always thought that the world was not yet ready for an adaptation of X Men, but roughly the first half was passable and a successful deal. The second is another thing, there really was an evolution, and mutual plot to show a movie 5 stars, Bryan Singer was able to give each mutant a stage with mathematical efficiency, in addition to the first step to one of the best sagas, of the Phoenix, the last scene where you see the silhouette of the bird of fire under the alkaline lake was almost too amazing and left you clamoring for a sequel. Yet again the greedy hands of hollywood balls to be responsible for another good story, the Fox executives pulled Singer to replace Brett Ratner, recontra-fucking the dark phoenix saga leaving in place for this chick should have been part of the night of the dead living.
What horror!, And not least, we put a frame that has no rhyme or reason, but afflict so much but (we kill key characters like Cyclops!) That leave not even the hope of a sequel to fix the bullshit army. Spiderman 3
Of all the sequels ruined man Spiderman 3 is the one I hurt, seriously, it was personal, he left a deep imprint on my subconscious and it took me 5 kilos of antacids. This time no change to the director or screenwriter, or the actors. It was the same rotten shit group came to the club for all fans of wall-crawler. I was a faithful follower of the previous films, is further defended when there were people who criticize them, do not miss any of the premiers and smiled like an idiot in front of the screen, ignoring the rudeness and Macanita that from time to time Sam was sent Raimi. And for what, so that after much delay, this monumental crap out. For the thousand devils!, Would be the first time carried Venom to the big screen, the best villains I've ever known in the comic world and with it the saga of the "black suit", years of waiting, only to receive a low blow, followed by nausea and a colossal passionate desire to become a terrorist.
The first mistake was to increase the level of whining from Peter Parker, in the previous films, say within the ranges had been "tolerable", but this time they passed his hand. It is true that in the comic Parker's character was at times, silent, introverted and kind, but it was not at all a cowardly geek who seems to wet their pants. However what was more humiliating to see this my character favorite version of "bad"
No further comment. Ending
should say that we just do macumba for Nolan break the curse of the "third parties" and leave us with a movie, maybe not better than The Dark Knight, but at least with a decent following.
PS: since this post is quite long and was made in a short time, I'm sure must have endless misspellings and other inconsistencies, so, I apologize. Yesterday
0 comments:
Post a Comment